FATE MORPH
FATE MORPH Art
Credit: Natasha Hanacek/NIST

Latest Report | Participation Agreement | API | Validation | Encryption | Submit

Overview

This page summarizes and links to all FATE data and reports related to face morphing.

2025-08-18 NISTIR 8584 FATE MORPH Part 4B: Considerations for Implementing Morph Detection in Operations PDF
2024-06-07 NISTIR 8292 Draft Supplement: FATE Part 4: MORPH - Performance of Automated Face Morph Detection PDF
2022-07-28 NISTIR 8430: FATE MORPH Part 4A: Utility of 1:N Face Recognition Algorithms for Morph Detection PDF

Status

Status

A new demorphing track has been added to our evaluation, which tests algorithmic ability to recover images of original identities from a morphed photo. Updates have been published in the API document and validation package.

[2026-01-09] An updated FATE MORPH report has been published, adding results for one new algorithm submitted by secunet (secunet-004).

[2025-08-18] We have released NISTIR 8584 - FATE MORPH Part 4B: Considerations for Implementing Morph Detection in Operations. As described in this press release, the document is intended to build awareness and to guide organizations toward effective deployment of tools and practices in situations where morphed photographs are a concern in operational workflows. It includes guidelines for what organizations might consider doing after a morph detector generates a positive indication or a suspicious photo is detected through human review.

[2025-07-29] An updated FATE MORPH report has been published, adding results for one new algorithm submitted by Vision-Box (visionbox-001).

[2025-06-06] An updated FATE MORPH report has been published. In alignment with the final draft ISO/IEC FDIS 20059 standard on methodologies to evaluate the resistance of biometric recognition systems to morphing attacks, the reporting of BPCER (Bona Fide Presentation Classification Error Rate) in this report has been deprecated and replaced with BSCER (Bona Fide Sample Classification Error Rate).

[2025-02-27] An updated FATE MORPH report has been published, adding results for one new algorithm submitted by secunet (secunet-003). Additionally, we have added morph detection timing durations to our leaderboard.

[2025-01-24] An updated FATE MORPH report has been published, adding results for one new algorithm submitted by the Fraunhofer Institute for Telecommunications Heinrich Hertz Institute (hhi-002).

Accuracy Summary

[last updated: 2026-01-09]

Morph Detection Performance

Morph Detection Performance

The table provides a summary of all algorithms measured on morphing attack classification error rate (MACER) when bona fide sample classification error rate (BSCER) is set to 0.003, across a subset of the different morphing datasets used in our evaluation. MACER, or morph miss rate, is the proportion of morphs that are incorrectly classified as bona fides (nonmorphs). BSCER, or false detection rate, is the proportion of bona fides falsely classified as morphs. Timing durations were computed on an Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6248 CPU @ 2.50GHz machine for algorithms submitted after February 2022.

Face Recognition Accuracy on Morphs

Face Recognition Accuracy on Morphs

The graph below plots face recognition algorithm vulnerability on morphs against general algorithm accuracy on non-morphed photos. Each circular point represents a face recognition algorithm recently submitted to the NIST FRTE 1:1 activity, and each triangular point represents a face recognition algorithm submitted to the NIST FATE MORPH activity. Note that algorithms submitted to FRTE 1:1 are not necessarily designed to handle morphed photos, and results are presented only as a point of reference. Submissions to FATE MORPH are designed with goals of face recognition algorithm resistance against morphing. The y-axis plots MMPMR, which is the fraction of morphs where both subjects incorrectly match to the morph. The x-axis plots FNMR or miss rate on regular photos, which provides an indication of general algorithm accuracy. Both MMPMR and FNMR are calculated with thresholds set to where the false match rate (FMR) is 0.0001. The lower the MMPMR, the better the algorithm performs against morphs.
MMPMR vs. FNMR


The table below provides numerical tabulation of MMPMR and FNMR for recent face recognition algorithms submitted to FATE MORPH and FRTE 1:1, ordered initially by FNMR.


Tier 1 - Low Quality Morphs


      (Morphing Methods: Public Domain)

Website

Website