2 Timing Sample Dataset

A fixed sample of images randomly selected from the PFT III datasets are used to assess whether or not an implementation adheres to the minimum timing requirements set forth in the PFT III test plan. This sample is also used to provide an estimate on template size. The images and comparisons are identical to the “1K Sample Evaluation” from NIST’s PFT II evaluation, with the exception of the “IARPA N2N” dataset, which is new in PFT III. Table 2.1 shows information about the maximum dimensions and resolutions of the images in each of the timing sample datasets.

Table 2.1: Maximum dimensions in pixels and capture resolution in pixels per inch (PPI) for the images in each of the subsets comprising the timing sample dataset.
AZ LA County DHS 2 POE+BVA IARPA N2N
Max Dimensions (pixels) 800 x 800 412 x 1 000 368 x 368 500 x 500 1 600 x 1 500
Resolution (PPI) 500 500 500 500 1 000

2.1 Template Size

Figure 2.1 and Table 2.2 show the distribution of file sizes of templates. Failures of any kind reported during template generation result in NIST code writing 0 byte files. These files are excluded from the template size analysis in this section.

Box plots of template sizes in bytes of templates created from a fixed sample of data from the PFT III evaluation. An overall plot is shown, as well as individual plots per data origin. Tabular versions of this data are shown in Table 2.2.

Figure 2.1: Box plots of template sizes in bytes of templates created from a fixed sample of data from the PFT III evaluation. An overall plot is shown, as well as individual plots per data origin. Tabular versions of this data are shown in Table 2.2.

Table 2.2: Sizes in bytes of templates created from a fixed sample of data from the PFT III evaluation. The bottom row, Failures, shows the number of failures to create a template, which are not included in these statistics. Box plots of this data are shown in Figure 2.1.
Overall AZ LA County DHS 2 POE+BVA IARPA N2N
Min 1 491 3 591 2 616 4 791 1 491 14 466
25 % 24 891 58 416 40 341 21 291 20 316 45 666
Median 37 566 66 666 46 566 24 891 23 766 56 091
Mean 42 259 67 299 47 106 25 043 24 233 58 343
75 % 57 366 75 816 53 484 28 509 27 816 68 466
Max 116 091 116 091 95 841 49 491 51 141 115 716
Failures 0 0 0 0 0 0

2.2 Template Creation Time

Figure 2.2 and Table 2.3 show the distribution of durations of time consumed when creating templates. Failures of all kinds are incorporated into these statistics, since this time would be observed by the end user of a template creation algorithm.

Times are measured by running a single process on an isolated compute node equipped with an Intel Xeon Gold 6254 CPU.

Box plots of elapsed milliseconds when creating templates from a fixed sample of data from the PFT III evaluation. All times are used, even if a failure occurred. Tabular versions of this data are shown in Table 2.3.

Figure 2.2: Box plots of elapsed milliseconds when creating templates from a fixed sample of data from the PFT III evaluation. All times are used, even if a failure occurred. Tabular versions of this data are shown in Table 2.3.

Table 2.3: Elapsed milliseconds when creating templates from a fixed sample of data from the PFT III evaluation. All times are used, even if a failure occurred. The bottom row, Failures, shows the number of failures to generate a template. Failures are included in these statistics. Box plots of this data are shown in Figure 2.2.
Overall AZ LA County DHS 2 POE+BVA IARPA N2N
Min 119.4 138.1 122.3 152.4 119.4 210.3
25 % 176.0 411.8 307.9 169.4 159.5 354.1
Median 286.7 464.0 342.8 177.9 167.5 427.5
Mean 302.1 470.9 339.2 179.3 172.4 442.3
75 % 402.8 521.8 373.6 187.0 180.6 515.1
Max 3 032.9 3 032.9 901.7 630.8 602.3 1 065.3
Failures 0 0 0 0 0 0

2.3 Template Comparison Time

Figure 2.3 and Table 2.4 show the distribution of durations of time consumed when comparing templates. Failures of any kind are incorporated into these statistics, since this time would be observed by the end user of a template comparison algorithm.

Times are measured by running a single process on an isolated compute node equipped with an Intel Xeon Gold 6254 CPU.

Box plots of elapsed microseconds when comparing two templates from a fixed sample of data from the PFT III evaluation. All times are used, even if a failure occurred. Tabular versions of this data are shown in Table 2.4.

Figure 2.3: Box plots of elapsed microseconds when comparing two templates from a fixed sample of data from the PFT III evaluation. All times are used, even if a failure occurred. Tabular versions of this data are shown in Table 2.4.

Table 2.4: Elapsed microseconds when comparing two templates from a fixed sample of data from the PFT III evaluation. The bottom row, Failures, shows the number of failures to compare. Failures are included in these statistics. Box plots of this data are shown in Figure 2.4.
Overall AZ LA County DHS 2 POE+BVA IARPA N2N
Min 126.6 2 922.6 1 878.0 793.9 126.6 2 011.2
25 % 2 193.9 4 717.1 3 212.8 1 749.9 1 574.0 4 180.1
Median 3 546.7 5 787.5 3 721.0 2 066.2 2 076.3 5 459.4
Mean 4 380.9 6 600.2 4 400.2 2 372.1 2 415.1 6 145.2
75 % 5 383.4 7 515.5 4 717.4 2 383.4 2 464.1 6 992.6
Max 611 214.5 611 214.5 526 803.5 512 148.1 508 023.6 509 448.4
Failures 0 0 0 0 0 0