Skip to content

Runs - Novelty 2002

CIIR02tfkl

Results | Participants | Proceedings | Input | Summary | Appendix

  • Run ID: CIIR02tfkl
  • Participant: umass
  • Track: Novelty
  • Year: 2002
  • Submission: 8/31/2002
  • Run description: We use a tf*idf weighting scheme to identify relevant sentences and KL divergence to identify novel sentences.

CIIR02tfnew

Results | Participants | Proceedings | Input | Summary | Appendix

  • Run ID: CIIR02tfnew
  • Participant: umass
  • Track: Novelty
  • Year: 2002
  • Submission: 8/31/2002
  • Run description: We use a tf*idf weighting scheme to identify relevant sentences and a count of new words to identify novel sentences.

cmu02t300rAs

Results | Participants | Proceedings | Input | Summary | Appendix

  • Run ID: cmu02t300rAs
  • Participant: cmu_lti
  • Track: Novelty
  • Year: 2002
  • Submission: 9/3/2002
  • Run description: Run cmu02t300rAs uses TFIDF weighting with pseudo-relevance feedback to find highly relevant sentences, using a single threshold rule, followed by a very simple translation model based on shallow parsing and Wordnet to remove redundant sentences (across all documents).

cmu02t300rBw

Results | Participants | Proceedings | Input | Summary | Appendix

  • Run ID: cmu02t300rBw
  • Participant: cmu_lti
  • Track: Novelty
  • Year: 2002
  • Submission: 9/3/2002
  • Run description: Run cmu02t300rBw uses TFIDF weighting with pseudo-relevance feedback to find relevant sentences, paired with a simple discriminative classifier based on surface and semantic features, followed by a very simple translation model based on shallow parsing and Wordnet to remove redundant sentences.

cmu02t300rCb

Results | Participants | Proceedings | Input | Summary | Appendix

  • Run ID: cmu02t300rCb
  • Participant: cmu_lti
  • Track: Novelty
  • Year: 2002
  • Submission: 9/3/2002
  • Run description: Run cmu02t300rCb is a baseline, using TFIDF weighting with pseudo-relevance feedback to find highly relevant sentences, and performing a trivial novelty step that accepts all sentences.

cmu02t300rCv

Results | Participants | Proceedings | Input | Summary | Appendix

  • Run ID: cmu02t300rCv
  • Participant: cmu_lti
  • Track: Novelty
  • Year: 2002
  • Submission: 9/3/2002
  • Run description: Run cmu02t300rCv uses TFIDF weighting with pseudo-relevance feedback to find highly relevant sentences, then includes neighbor sentences based on additional criteria, followed by a very simple translation model based on shallow parsing and Wordnet to remove redundant sentences.

cmu02t300rCw

Results | Participants | Proceedings | Input | Summary | Appendix

  • Run ID: cmu02t300rCw
  • Participant: cmu_lti
  • Track: Novelty
  • Year: 2002
  • Submission: 9/3/2002
  • Run description: Run cmu02t300rCw uses TFIDF weighting with pseudo-relevance feedback to find highly relevant sentences, then includes neighbor sentences based on additional criteria, followed by a simple translation model with shallow parsing and Wordnet to remove redundant sentences (lower threshold, within docs only).

dumbrun

Results | Participants | Proceedings | Input | Summary | Appendix

  • Run ID: dumbrun
  • Participant: irit
  • Track: Novelty
  • Year: 2002
  • Submission: 9/4/2002
  • Run description: for relevant sentences, we use topic terms weighting and match them against every sentence. For new sentences we compute individual sentence-to-sentence similarity and global sentences-to-sentence similarity.

fdut11n1

Results | Participants | Input | Summary | Appendix

  • Run ID: fdut11n1
  • Participant: Fudan
  • Track: Novelty
  • Year: 2002
  • Submission: 9/3/2002
  • Run description: hmm based relevance decision

fdut11n2

Results | Participants | Input | Summary | Appendix

  • Run ID: fdut11n2
  • Participant: Fudan
  • Track: Novelty
  • Year: 2002
  • Submission: 9/3/2002
  • Run description: hmm based relevance decision

fdut11n3

Results | Participants | Input | Summary | Appendix

  • Run ID: fdut11n3
  • Participant: Fudan
  • Track: Novelty
  • Year: 2002
  • Submission: 9/3/2002
  • Run description: simple method

novcolcl35

Results | Participants | Proceedings | Input | Summary | Appendix

  • Run ID: novcolcl35
  • Participant: columbia_novelty
  • Track: Novelty
  • Year: 2002
  • Submission: 9/2/2002
  • Run description: Sentences (or in some runs smaller units) were identified by the existence of topic concepts, which are similar to expanded queried built with the help of WordNet and co-occurrences in a background corpus, and in addition, an attempt was made to segement the articles into sections of higher concentration of topic concepts, and to determine the kind of document set and set the system parameters accordingly, while novelty was decided by the degree of overlap of these topic concepts.

novcolcl85

Results | Participants | Proceedings | Input | Summary | Appendix

  • Run ID: novcolcl85
  • Participant: columbia_novelty
  • Track: Novelty
  • Year: 2002
  • Submission: 9/2/2002
  • Run description: Sentences (or in some runs smaller units) were identified by the existence of topic concepts, which are similar to expanded queried built with the help of WordNet and co-occurrences in a background corpus, and in addition, an attempt was made to segement the articles

novcolclfx

Results | Participants | Proceedings | Input | Summary | Appendix

  • Run ID: novcolclfx
  • Participant: columbia_novelty
  • Track: Novelty
  • Year: 2002
  • Submission: 9/2/2002
  • Run description: Sentences (or in some runs smaller units) were identified by the existence of topic concepts, which are similar to expanded queried built with the help of WordNet and co-occurrences in a background corpus, and in addition, an attempt was made to segement the art

novcolmerg

Results | Participants | Proceedings | Input | Summary | Appendix

  • Run ID: novcolmerg
  • Participant: columbia_novelty
  • Track: Novelty
  • Year: 2002
  • Submission: 9/2/2002
  • Run description: Sentences (or in some runs smaller units) were identified by the existence of topic concepts, which are similar to expanded queried built with the help of WordNet and co-occurrences in a background corpus, and in addition, an attempt was made to segement the art

novcolsent

Results | Participants | Proceedings | Input | Summary | Appendix

  • Run ID: novcolsent
  • Participant: columbia_novelty
  • Track: Novelty
  • Year: 2002
  • Submission: 9/2/2002
  • Run description: Sentences (or in some runs smaller units) were identified by the existence of topic concepts, which are similar to expanded queried built with the help of WordNet and co-occurrences in a background corpus, and in addition, an attempt was made to segement the

nttcslabnvp

Results | Participants | Proceedings | Input | Summary | Appendix

  • Run ID: nttcslabnvp
  • Participant: nttcom_kazawa
  • Track: Novelty
  • Year: 2002
  • Submission: 9/3/2002
  • Run description: Machine learning (SVM)

nttcslabnvr2

Results | Participants | Proceedings | Input | Summary | Appendix

  • Run ID: nttcslabnvr2
  • Participant: nttcom_kazawa
  • Track: Novelty
  • Year: 2002
  • Submission: 9/3/2002
  • Run description: Machine learining with SVM (RBF kernels)

ntu1

Results | Participants | Proceedings | Input | Summary | Appendix

  • Run ID: ntu1
  • Participant: NTU
  • Track: Novelty
  • Year: 2002
  • Submission: 9/3/2002
  • Run description: use sliding windows to exact relevant sentence, and do the text segmentation, and compare similarity between each sentence and each segment.

ntu2

Results | Participants | Proceedings | Input | Summary | Appendix

  • Run ID: ntu2
  • Participant: NTU
  • Track: Novelty
  • Year: 2002
  • Submission: 9/3/2002
  • Run description: use sliding windows to exact relevant sentence, and do the text segmentation, and compare similarity between each sentence and each segment.

ntu3

Results | Participants | Proceedings | Input | Summary | Appendix

  • Run ID: ntu3
  • Participant: NTU
  • Track: Novelty
  • Year: 2002
  • Submission: 9/3/2002
  • Run description: use sliding windows to exact relevant sentence, and do the text segmentation, and compare similarity between each sentence and each segment.

pircs2N01

Results | Participants | Proceedings | Input | Summary | Appendix

  • Run ID: pircs2N01
  • Participant: cuny
  • Track: Novelty
  • Year: 2002
  • Submission: 9/1/2002
  • Run description: Sentence retrieved by pircs using trec8 dictionary, relevent senctence threshold by rsv >=1.25, novelty threshold by |sent1 ^ sent2|/|sent1 V sent2| < .3

pircs2N02

Results | Participants | Proceedings | Input | Summary | Appendix

  • Run ID: pircs2N02
  • Participant: cuny
  • Track: Novelty
  • Year: 2002
  • Submission: 9/1/2002
  • Run description: Sentence retrieved by pircs using trec8 dictionary, relevant senctence threshold by rsv >=1.25, novelty threshold by |sent1 ^ sent2|/|sent1 V sent2| <= .5

pircs2N03

Results | Participants | Proceedings | Input | Summary | Appendix

  • Run ID: pircs2N03
  • Participant: cuny
  • Track: Novelty
  • Year: 2002
  • Submission: 9/1/2002
  • Run description: Sentence retrieved by pircs using trec8 dictionary, relevant senctence threshold by rsv >=1.5, novelty threshold by |sent1 ^ sent2|/|sent1 V sent2| <= .3

pircs2N04

Results | Participants | Proceedings | Input | Summary | Appendix

  • Run ID: pircs2N04
  • Participant: cuny
  • Track: Novelty
  • Year: 2002
  • Submission: 9/1/2002
  • Run description: Sentence retrieved by pircs using trec8 dictionary, relevant sentence threshold by rsv >=1.5, novelty threshold by |sent1 ^ sent2|/|sent1 V sent2| <= .5

pircs2N05

Results | Participants | Proceedings | Input | Summary | Appendix

  • Run ID: pircs2N05
  • Participant: cuny
  • Track: Novelty
  • Year: 2002
  • Submission: 9/1/2002
  • Run description: Sentence retrieved by pircs using trec8 dictionary, relevant sentence threshold by rsv >=1.5, novelty threshold by |sent1 ^ sent2|/|sent1 V sent2| <= .3

ss1

Results | Participants | Proceedings | Input | Summary | Appendix

  • Run ID: ss1
  • Participant: streamsage
  • Track: Novelty
  • Year: 2002
  • Submission: 8/27/2002
  • Run description: Query expansion title terms plus multi-word units from news story corpus, and noun phrases from desc.

thunv1

Results | Participants | Proceedings | Input | Summary | Appendix

  • Run ID: thunv1
  • Participant: tsinghua
  • Track: Novelty
  • Year: 2002
  • Submission: 9/3/2002
  • Run description: Query expansion based on local term co-occurrence and document expansion based on wordNet, with topic classification according to documents.

thunv2

Results | Participants | Proceedings | Input | Summary | Appendix

  • Run ID: thunv2
  • Participant: tsinghua
  • Track: Novelty
  • Year: 2002
  • Submission: 9/3/2002
  • Run description: Query expansion based on local term co-occurrence and document expansion based on wordNet, with topic classification according to similarities between topic fields.

thunv3

Results | Participants | Proceedings | Input | Summary | Appendix

  • Run ID: thunv3
  • Participant: tsinghua
  • Track: Novelty
  • Year: 2002
  • Submission: 9/3/2002
  • Run description: Query expansion based on local term co-occurrence and document expansion based on wordNet, and results combination.

thunv4

Results | Participants | Proceedings | Input | Summary | Appendix

  • Run ID: thunv4
  • Participant: tsinghua
  • Track: Novelty
  • Year: 2002
  • Submission: 9/3/2002
  • Run description: Query expansion based on local term co-occurrence and Lin Dekang's dependency word similarity DB.

thunv5

Results | Participants | Proceedings | Input | Summary | Appendix

  • Run ID: thunv5
  • Participant: tsinghua
  • Track: Novelty
  • Year: 2002
  • Submission: 9/3/2002
  • Run description: Dcument expansion based on coordinate terms to eliminate duplicated information with probabilistic based system.

UAmsT11ntcom

Results | Participants | Proceedings | Input | Summary | Appendix

  • Run ID: UAmsT11ntcom
  • Participant: uva
  • Track: Novelty
  • Year: 2002
  • Submission: 9/3/2002
  • Run description: Retrieval part based on a combined run; simple frequency-based method for determining novelty

UAmsT11ntlem

Results | Participants | Proceedings | Input | Summary | Appendix

  • Run ID: UAmsT11ntlem
  • Participant: uva
  • Track: Novelty
  • Year: 2002
  • Submission: 9/3/2002
  • Run description: TreeTagger-based lemmatization; simple frequency-based method for determining novelty

UAmsT11ntste

Results | Participants | Proceedings | Input | Summary | Appendix

  • Run ID: UAmsT11ntste
  • Participant: uva
  • Track: Novelty
  • Year: 2002
  • Submission: 9/3/2002
  • Run description: Porter stemming; simple frequency-based method for determining novelty

UIowa02Nov4

Results | Participants | Input | Summary | Appendix

  • Run ID: UIowa02Nov4
  • Participant: uiowa
  • Track: Novelty
  • Year: 2002
  • Submission: 9/3/2002
  • Run description: new named entities and nounphrases, threshold tuned for balance of recall and precision

UIowa02Nov5

Results | Participants | Input | Summary | Appendix

  • Run ID: UIowa02Nov5
  • Participant: uiowa
  • Track: Novelty
  • Year: 2002
  • Submission: 9/3/2002
  • Run description: new named entities and nounphrases, threshold tuned for precision

umich1

Results | Participants | Proceedings | Input | Summary | Appendix

  • Run ID: umich1
  • Participant: umich
  • Track: Novelty
  • Year: 2002
  • Submission: 9/4/2002
  • Run description: Adapt the MEAD summarizer to identify novel sentences.

UMIch2

Results | Participants | Proceedings | Input | Summary | Appendix

  • Run ID: UMIch2
  • Participant: umich
  • Track: Novelty
  • Year: 2002
  • Submission: 9/4/2002
  • Run description: Adapt the MEAD summarizer to identify novel sentences.

UMich3

Results | Participants | Proceedings | Input | Summary | Appendix

  • Run ID: UMich3
  • Participant: umich
  • Track: Novelty
  • Year: 2002
  • Submission: 9/4/2002
  • Run description: Adapt the MEAD summarizer to identify novel sentences.

UMICH4

Results | Participants | Proceedings | Input | Summary | Appendix

  • Run ID: UMICH4
  • Participant: umich
  • Track: Novelty
  • Year: 2002
  • Submission: 9/4/2002
  • Run description: Adapt the MEAD summarizer to identify novel sentences.

UMich5

Results | Participants | Proceedings | Input | Summary | Appendix

  • Run ID: UMich5
  • Participant: umich
  • Track: Novelty
  • Year: 2002
  • Submission: 9/4/2002
  • Run description: Adapt the MEAD summarizer to identify novel sentences.