Federal Software Acquisition Use Case

Follow along as a federal agency uses BloSS@M to evaluate, select, and manage a commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) software solution throughout its lifecycle.

1
📋
Overview of Use Case Example

A federal organization needs to acquire a commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) software product to perform a critical mission activity, such as data analysis and reporting. Several comparable solutions are already in use across government agencies, but they vary in pricing structures, licensing approaches, and security features. The organization's objective is to identify the option that best satisfies operational requirements while reducing both overall expenditures and potential cybersecurity vulnerabilities.

2
🔍
Asset Discovery and Initial Filtering

Through BloSS@M, the agency searches the enterprise software inventory to locate solutions that satisfy established operational requirements and policy constraints. The platform generates a set of eligible software options available under the enterprise leasing framework, including applications that have already been licensed and deployed by other federal organizations.

3
💰
Evaluating the Asset's Cost and Leasing

For every software option identified, BloSS@M provides details on licensing arrangements and related leasing costs. The agency reviews and compares anticipated expenses across alternatives while assessing opportunities to reallocate or extend existing leased licenses, helping to avoid unnecessary purchases and streamline acquisition efforts.

4
🔒
Security Configuration and Control Review

The agency assesses the security characteristics of each potential software solution by examining its associated OSCAL Component Definition artifacts. These standardized artifacts document the security controls implemented within each product, allowing the agency to compare security features across options and determine how well they satisfy organizational security and compliance requirements.

5
⚠️
Analyzing for Vulnerabilities and Threats

BloSS@M automatically links each prospective software product to the latest vulnerability data available from the NVD. At the same time, the platform enriches the assessment with threat intelligence by correlating documented security controls to applicable MITRE ATT&CK techniques and related MITRE D3FEND countermeasures. This combined analysis enables the agency to compare the relative risk exposure and defensive capabilities of the available software options.

6
🤖
AI-Assisted Provisional Assessment

Using consolidated information on security configurations, known vulnerabilities, and relevant threat intelligence, BloSS@M produces an AI-assisted preliminary evaluation for each candidate software asset. The evaluation highlights potential security concerns, identifies areas where controls may be insufficient, and assesses the extent to which implemented safeguards address recognized adversary tactics and defensive practices. These outputs are intended to support decision-making and risk analysis, rather than serve as official authorization or compliance documentation.

7
📊
Selection and Ongoing Monitoring

Drawing on the cost, capability, and security insights generated by BloSS@M, the agency chooses the software solution that most effectively satisfies its operational objectives, financial constraints, and cybersecurity needs. After implementation, BloSS@M remains engaged throughout the asset's lifecycle by overseeing license utilization, identifying newly reported vulnerabilities, and continuously updating threat correlations and mitigation information as external intelligence sources change over time.

BloSS@M leverages SWID tags—standardized, machine-readable identifiers that capture software product details such as version, edition, patch level, and lifecycle events including installation, updates, and removal—to provide continuous visibility into license allocation and usage. Through this capability, organizations can monitor software deployment and removal activities across their environments, confirm that updates and security patches have been applied, and verify that software instances have been properly uninstalled before leased licenses are returned to the BloSS@M license pool. By integrating SWID tag information with licensing agreements, configuration requirements, and security posture data, organizations can maintain accurate software inventories, improve license compliance, and ensure that deployed applications remain current, supported, and secure.

In addition, BloSS@M's asset leasing and traceability capabilities enhance accountability, governance, and continuous authorization efforts by delivering near-real-time insight into software lifecycle events and system state changes through a standardized, automatable framework. This functionality enables organizational stakeholders to access reliable evidence for audit and compliance activities while allowing BloSS@M service providers to maintain an accurate and up-to-date inventory of software licenses available across the enterprise.